Pattern Interruption Non-News has no informational value, just potential experiential value. [Food-for-thought, by definition, comes with indigestion. If food-for-thought goes down easy, it's not food-for-thought but just brain-candy.]
I write this freely, unafraid of self-contradiction. And I encourage you to read this blog with the same attitude of interpretive freedom.
Walt Whitman: Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself. I am large: I contain multitudes.
Thursday, October 28, 2010 Ontologically, I boxed myself into a corner.
A point of view always remains, right, René?
Life (and Death, for that matter) is a matter of opinion,
i.e. a matter of consciousness,
i.e. (again) an opinion made of matter.
So, before you kick a random stone on the road,
ask yourself:
“Does it consider itself alive?”
Notes:
René = Descartes
Friday, February 19, 2010 At a
sub-atomical level
of, course, I am matter.
But at a
sub-atomical level
of, course, I am consciousness.
Is the sub of your meaning diving or resurfacing right now?
Thursday, July 23, 2009 Frank Wilczek (Nobel Prize in Physics 2004), in his book (The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces), in his introduction of quarks and gluons ("the littler bits" within protons and neutrons), concludes: "the its are the bits." The "its" here is not a misspelling. What Wilczek asserts is that the fundamental objects of matter are... information. In other words, matter = information = mind. What do you think?
consciousness, information, matter, mind, physics News programming conditions. Non-News Mindstream de-conditions and de-programs.
Do I stand by any of these thoughts? Not when I sit (in meditation).